this issue contains
>> An Interview with Andrea Zittel
>> Miwa Yanagi: The Beauty of the Prison
>> Franz Ackermann's Mental Maps
>> New Forms of Governance
>> Working on the Myth

>> archive

 

CK: Your work uses that line between escape, as a voluntary removal from society, and exile, as a removal that terminates communal participation. Pocket Property, a 44-ton floating island off the coast of Denmark commissioned by the Danish government, fused an extreme escape with an exile.

AZ: With Pocket Property, I was thinking about suburbia. There's always a tropical yard and an Alpine yard. You want a house with a big lawn and you have this illusion that you don't have neighbors, but you do. We crave our own isolated kingdom.

CK: Escape offers pleasure. Exile is quite the opposite. Are your Units prototypes for an ideal city that's neither urban nor suburban?

AZ: They're markers or indicators of a condition. I wonder what would happen if we lived in Van Capsules and traveled everywhere; if you wanted to live with somebody you could dock together. That's a viable extension of the Unit idea, but I'm not sure that would be healthy, either.



Andrea Zittel: A-Z Homestead Units #2, 2001,
Deutsche Bank Collection, © Andrea Zittel

CK: The edge between function, restraint, and pleasure is part of your work, especially as it relates to social order. Is restraint an urban or an anti-urban trait?

AZ: It's a capitalist trait, which makes it urban. When you're working within a large population, you need parameters for everything to function. In an anti-urban environment, you don't need everyone to clock-work. There's room for deviation.

CK: Social order is a self-policing mechanism. That also applies to your original breeding units, when you lived in 200 square feet with 200 or so chickens and other animals in the early 90s.

AZ: The rules fall apart all the time as much as they work.



Andrea Zittel: A-Z Breeding Unit for Averaging Eight Breeds, 1993,
Courtesy the artist and Andrea Rosen Gallery New York, © Andrea Zittel, Photo: Paula Goldman

CK: In what way does the choreography between movement and settlement provide the organizing architecture for your work in all its forms?

AZ: I feel pulled through two dynamics. One is freedom and movement, the other is security and comfort. There's a tension where one wins out, but sometimes it's the other that wins for a while, then the other takes over out of necessity. One goes too far being mobile or exposed for too long, and then you react by getting a house in the desert.

CK: Even Jack Kerouac might have settled down eventually.

AZ: I imagine one of these values is the correct one, I just can't figure out which one.


[1] [2] [3] [4]