Selection of reviews on Gerhard Richter's Eight Grey
“The
rind of knuckled pork, the walls of the buildings, the water of the River
Spree – everything appears grey on grey…” The newcomer Tobias Timm,
spurred on by the monochrome appearance of Richter’s Eight Grey, uses his
exhibition
review in the Süddeutsche Zeitung as an opportunity to voice
some fundamental observations concerning Berlin’s grey weather and the
mentality of the capital city’s inhabitants in comparison to other major
European cities: “The problem, however, also has to do with the way people
deal with the climatic difficulties here. Other large cities that have
to put up with miserable weather, such as London or Hamburg, have developed
historical strategies for confronting the leaden grey with elegance and
style: with a fine cup of tea and wearing a suit of grey flannel, one can
survive a rainy day in a decidedly civilized manner.” What about a nice
full-spectrum light therapy?
“This is how minimalism can work in
the best of cases.” Ulrich Clewing praises
Eight Grey in the Frankfurter Zeitung, describing it as a kind of
stage on which everything and everybody plays a role: the visitors, the
guards, the quality of light, the hiss of the coffee machine, the noise
and the happenings outside on the street. “Whoever remains here for some
time soon ceases to walk through the space, but moves more and more deliberately,
almost cautiously from one end of the room to the other,” Clewing muses,
wondering if this minimalist reduction in Richter’s work doesn’t at the
same time mark a conclusion in Richter’s work. |
Yet he leaves everything
open towards the end of his article: “One could think that these eight
panels represent a kind of essence of the seventy year-old artist’s work.
But maybe it’s precisely the other way around: a beginning.”
In
contrast to other presentations of contemporary art, where the mood can
be “relaxed, discerning, or even amused,” Mark Siemons observes
a sense of “restrained aggression” in Eight Grey in the “capital city column”
of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. “Each person is looking at
their own reflection, how they’re standing in front of the grey panel struggling
to peer inside it.” If it weren’t for the guest book, which the author
quotes from at length, we wouldn’t be in a position to do much more than
guess at what goes on in a visitor’s mind while viewing the panes of glass.
“It seems that the smooth surfaces, which fail to reveal any evidence of
personal influence,” can only, in his opinion, “be appreciated in the biographical
context of their maker – or in the context of the bank, where they could
stand for the real symbol of money in all its emptiness and abstraction,
making everything and nothing possible.” More obstinacy is called for in
the face of insecurities of this nature: “Yet the only visitors that can
be termed truly independent are the ones who don’t let their view become
dictated by art: ‘The woman at the cash register really is quite beautiful,
isn’t she.’” |