"In Fantastic Company": The exhibition Man in the Middle shows
a century of human images
Back in the seventies, David Bowie
used to sing about his "Man in the Middle": "Like an inventor / He is a
symbol of a new age / He glides above the realms / Of you and me…"
Bowie's
song
portrays a paradox. As an inventor and a symbol of the emerging future,
the "Man in the Middle" effortlessly overcomes the gap between "me" and
"you," between inside and outside. Yet despite this, he appears as a projection
uninvolved in the reality of those who have been "left behind" and who
are unable to live up to the demands of a new era.
St. Petersburg
in the fall of 2002: with approximately a hundred drawings, paintings,
sculptures, and photographs from the collection of the Deutsche Bank, the
exhibition Man
in the Middle documents the ever-changing human image from modernism
up to the present day. The broad spectrum of artistic positions introduced
in the rooms of St. Petersburg's Eremitage
provides an insight into an era that, more than any other before it, has
been marked both by collective visions and the struggle for individual
self-determination. Following the exhibition A
Century of Landscapes, which has been touring throughout Germany
since 1999 and can presently be seen in the South
African National Gallery in Capetown, Man in the Middle, as
one of the thematic exhibitions of Deutsche Bank's collection, concentrates
on the artistic reinvention of the human being in the 20th century as well
as on the cultural transformations reflected in its various images.

 Otto Dix, Großstadt (Entwurf zu Großstadttriptychon), 1926 © VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2002
Ranging
from representatives of German Expressionism, such as Ludwig Ernst Kirchner
or Max Beckmann - who called for a return to original, existential values
in their formal allegiance to the Primitive - to the cards with superstars'
autographs that the American Richard Prince reproduces as cool relics of
a media age under the slogan "all the best":

 Richard Prince, Courtney Love, Fred Savage, Keanu Reeves (all the best), 2000 © Galerie Jablonka, Köln
the artistic upheavals that
Man in the Middle marks over the course of a century make the ambiguity
embodied in every human likeness clear - whether it's idealized as is the case with Sugimoto,
Princess Diana, ironic as with Charles Avery, or pessimistic as with Lovis
Corinth's self-portrait.
No matter how much we try to find and articulate the common in ever newer
inventions of ourselves, it appears all the more questionable whether this
attempt can ever really bring forth a valid definition of the human.
Whereas
the concentric model of the atom was the symbol of progress for the 20th
century, largely determined as it was by mechanization, the symbol of the
network has assumed its place in the digital age, in which a clear center
can no longer be located. The search for identity-generating values in
culture, business, and politics, for an authentic "center" to a human being
situated within the society surrounding him is evidently more than ever
accompanied by insecurity in view of the effects of globalization.

 Hiroshi Sugimoto, Princess Diana, 1999 © Deutsche Guggenheim Berlin

 Charles Avery, Uncle Eugene's Funeral, 1999 © Percy Miller Gallery, London
Although
communication and trade have increasingly shifted to the virtual realm,
rendering a connection to fixed locations, time zones, and personal encounters
more and more superfluous, the concept of individual and cultural identity
is undergoing a process of constant change, as well. If David Bowie, in
the pop circus of the seventies, resembled his "Man in the Middle," a chameleon-like,
fictitious figure that was able to slip into another identity with each
external transformation, nowadays everyone is called upon to reinvent himself
each and every day.
In view of the possibilities of digital, surgical,
and genetic manipulation, as well as an inexhaustible flood of media imagery,
the human being of the new millennium declares himself to be malleable
material.

 Franz West, Studie, 1999 © Atelier Franz West, Wien |

 Katharina Sieverding, Transformer, 1973 © VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2002
Whereas in the early seventies the staged, androgynous self-portrayals
of artists such as Katharina Sieverding or Jürgen
Klauke departed subversively from prevailing role models, bio-technological
innovations today determine the parameters of social and individual change.
It is no longer the subversive experiment that counts, but a longing for
bodily perfection and an absolute degree of self-control.
The modern
human being somewhere between dream and nightmare: a "chameleon-like being
with Sisyphean traits" is what Veit Loers called the artistic human image
of the 20th century in his catalogue essay on the exhibition (catalogue
essay here). A view into the collecting history of the Deutsche Bank presents
the challenge of juxtaposition - for the formal representation of the human
figure is intertwined with references to personal and social existence:
"Despite my experience, I am still idiotic enough to believe that human
beings continue to exist," said Elfriede
Lohse-Wächtler,

 Elfriede Lohse-Wächtler, Selbstportrait (in fantastischer Gesellschaft), 1931 © Förderkreis Elfriede Lohse-Wächtler, Hamburg
the painter from Dresden who, as an inmate of a Saxon
sanatorium, was murdered in 1940 in the sanatorium's gas chamber following
a compulsory sterilization (an essay on Lohse Wächtler and George Grosz
can be found here).
In her Self-Portrait (in Fantastic Company) of 1931, the fears and
doubts of an era characterized by inner and outer emigration become manifest.
Nonetheless, Wächtler's averted gaze is the look of a rebel who radically
went far beyond the traditional image of the woman and artist of her time,
trading in her protected bourgeois existence for the rough life in Hamburg's
red-light district. Following the National Socialist takeover, the artist
paid for her rebellion with her life.
Although entire worlds seem
to lie between the end of the Weimar Republic and New York's East Village
of the eighties, we encounter a similarly "fantastic company" at close
hand in Man in the Middle, for instance in Nan Goldin's portrait
of April in the Windows,

 Nan Goldin, April in the window, 1983 © Nan Goldin, New York
taken in 1983 in the back room of a New
York club. Goldin's photographs of friends, outsiders, scene denizens,
drag queens, and junkies, whom she accompanied with her camera for decades,
made her famous all around the world. How difficult this path at times
proved to be is something Goldin talks about in an interview
she gave to the Harvard Advocate in 1999: at the end of a five-month
drug and alcohol withdrawal in a Boston clinic, Goldin was supposed to
look for a job; although she had already published her book "The
Ballad of Sexual Dependency", the clinic did not consider art to be
a profession. Thus it came about that the photographer was framing slides
in the basement of a university library while her work was being lectured
on a floor above.
Just as references arise here among the most
varied works and biographies, Man in the Middle offers, in the truest
sense of the word, a stimulus to search out "company." The fact that we
are often quite possibly merely stumbling upon our own inventions in our
encounters with different human images is something the young British artist
Tim Stoner

 Tim Stoner, Study for Divinity 1, 1999 © Tim Stoner, London

 Tim Stoner, Study for Divinity 2, 1999 © Tim Stoner, London
depicts in his watercolors, which go by the programmatic title
Studies for Divinity. The supposedly idyllic impression of intimate
twosomeness is deceptive: in the reflective light of a double portrait,
we can see the faceless features of an embracing couple. Beyond any expression,
their faces appear to be surfaces upon which we can project the hopes and
fears of a new century.
Oliver Koerner von Gustorf
Translation:
Andrea Scrima
|